Not that Coulter has any value, but she does point to the classic prejudice against atheists: W.W.J.K.: WHO WOULD JESUS KILL?

Indeed, Hitler denounced Christianity as an “invention of the Jew” and vowed that the “organized lie (of Christianity) must be smashed” so that the state would “remain the absolute master.” Interestingly, this was the approach of all the great mass murderers of the last century — all of whom were atheists: Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot. [...]

But according to liberals, it’s Christianity that causes murder. (And don’t get them started on Zionism.) Like their Muslim friends still harping about the Crusades, liberals won’t “move on” from the Spanish Inquisition. In the entire 350 years of the Spanish Inquisition, about 30,000 people were killed. That’s an average of less than 100 a year. Stalin knocked off that many kulaks before breakfast.

Not that I understand the logic of this last paragraph, but whatever. Yes, let’s “move on” from the Crusades. Let’s talk about homophobia, racism, sexism, the KKK, and slavery. All that stuff has nothing to do with xianity, I assume. And so does Ann:

But again I ask: Does anyone at the Times have the vaguest notion what Christianity is? (Besides people who go around putting up nativity scenes that have to be taken down by court order?) The religion that toppled the Roman Empire — anyone?

Seems the problem lies in understanding atheism, not xianity.