Archive for March, 2006

I Said I Didn’t Want Any Spam!

31 March 2006

null
This is a problem that is becoming really irritating to me. I think it’s nervy of people who send religious/political propaganda to others, when they KNOW those people they are sending it to are atheists or others who have differing religious and/or political beliefs, and then to be rude on top of it! I have received these FWDs and such, not from strangers, but from FAMILY MEMBERS. I wonder how they would like it if I were to send atheistic emails to them? How about if I added the sentence that I sometimes find at the bottom of the things I receive… “if you don’t like it YOU JUST SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP”? Or a picture of a cross covered by a red circle with a line through it? Or maybe an article from American Atheist? Or the link to God is for Suckers! I don’t think they would like it very much! The christians in my family get angry and all bent out of shape by me merely telling them to please not send me those kinds of things. If you want to see a christian get really hateful and pissed off, just ask them to please keep their religion to themselves! It doesn’t work with some people to ask nicely; they keep on sending stuff anyway, and I keep on deleting it. My sister has a religious quote from the bible at the end of her emails and even though it is like sticking pins in me when I see it there, I don’t say anything because it is HER email. BUT when I recently put a Native American quote “A rocky vineyard does not need a prayer, but a pick ax.” at the end of mine, she was quite upset because it offended her! I have been tolerant for a long time now, but it’s really starting to piss me off. How do the rest of you handle this stuff with your families and friends?

  • Share/Bookmark

The Bible Zone

31 March 2006

Submitted for your approval:

“Movie Night” during the summer of 1978 at a small American missionary camp in the Dominican Republic. Pre-teens and brand-new best friends Eve and Martha Jean have bonded over their mutual obsession with Star Wars; Martha Jean dreams about marrying Mark Hamill, while Eve has begun writing the sequel. Little do they know that they’re about to watch a film from – the Bible Zone!

The camp counselors crowd the kids into the Recreation Center onto hard metal folding chairs, hit the lights, and set the projector rolling (yup, these are pre-video times, at least in this small Caribbean nation). There in the dark, Eve and Martha Jean watch in confusion, then horror as a live news broadcast, not a movie, flickers to life on the screen to report the beginning of the Rapture, Armageddon, and the end of the world – all happening right now.

“I’m scared,” Martha Jean whispers, clutching Eve’s arm.

“Me, too,” her friend sniffles back.

Huddled there in the dark, they watch the somber anchor people on the screen insist that the world is ending right at this moment. Eve wonders if her family back in her hometown might have been taken in the Rapture at the beginning of the newscast, leaving her to face the End Times all alone. A tiny, often-suppressed voice tells her it’s impossible and can’t really be happening; the adults would have already told them something – wouldn’t they?

Suddenly, the girl sitting next to Martha Jean murmurs something to her, and in turn Martha Jean hisses in Eve’s ear:

“Sally says Amy’s seen this before.”

Eve leans over Martha Jean past Sally to whisper to Amy, “Amy, you’ve seen this before?”

A missionary’s daughter, Amy answers nonchalantly, as if bored (which she probably is):

“Oh, yeah, it’s just a movie; I’ve seen it lots of times. My dad plays it all the time for people.”

Hugely relieved, the girls now view the film through new eyes; what seemed to be happening live now appears suspiciously dated – and who ever heard of a live newscast on film? Eve’s relief gives way to sheepishness; how could she have fallen so easily for such an obvious conversion ploy? By the end of the movie she just wants to forget the entire incident – but forgets to get angry at the people who succeeded for a while in tricking her so cruelly.

It will be years before she remembers, but the seeds have been sown…

The friends spend the rest of camp planning Martha Jean’s wedding to Luke Skywalker and editing Eve’s script for Star Wars: The Sequel. What lessons have they learned? Probably not the ones their counselors intended to teach them:

* Listen to your voice of reason.

* Find and use your common sense.

* Seek and share information.

And remember: sometimes you can’t trust those who have authority over you, especially when you’re in – the Bible Zone.

  • Share/Bookmark

Admin note: Moderated Comments

31 March 2006

Hey Monty, or whatever your name is: Your first comment got deleted by accident. That was my fault, and I applogize. Your second one got deleted because I didn’t want the world to see what a pitiful whiner you are. You should thank me.

  • Share/Bookmark

Xian Parenting Tip # 159: Get Thy Children to a CULT!

31 March 2006


with e-signature loans personal

On with e-signature loans personal telephone system, this is created by sending an alternating current signal of about 100 volts into the line.

loan template excel

Mobile phone manufacturers have been experimenting with alternate power sources, including solar cells.

loan california asset pledged

Patent 887,357 for loan california asset pledged telephone was issued in to Nathan B.

loans personal hfc

The nature of cellular technology renders many phones vulnerable to ‘cloning’: anytime loans personal hfc moves out of coverage (for example, in a road tunnel), when the signal is re-established, the phone will send out a ‘re-connect’ signal to the nearest cell-tower, identifying itself and signalling that it is again ready to transmit.

bad auto seller loan private credit

[10] UCAN and Cingular reached bad auto seller loan private credit on October 19, 2006, which resulted in stronger notification and authorization requirements for Cingular regarding non-communications charges and also required Cingular to institute a ready means to address billing issues and cancel wireless content services, such as bad auto seller loan private credit s.

calculator loan car

[6] calculator loan car alleges that Jamster! scammed cellular telephone customers through the use of fraudulent and deceptive advertisements.

http nationwide loans

It is also called http nationwide loans of the Mass Media (with Print, Recordings, Cinema, Radio, TV and Internet the first six).

v a loans

Numerous studies have reported no significant relationship between v a loans use and health.

loans bad rv credit

[50] Meta-analysis by loans bad rv credit Automobile Association[51] and The University of Illinois[52] found that response time while using both hands-free and hand-held phones was approximately 0.

loans personal online

Driving while using loans personal online device is not safer than driving while using a hand-held phone, as concluded by case-crossover studies.

  • Share/Bookmark

Xmas Island

30 March 2006

Okay, so can you tell I finished a major project and am slacking big time today?

I have always been fascinated by Christmas Island. I mean, it sounds like a place out of one of those old Rudolph the Reindeer stop-motion Xmas specials.

I looked it up (don’t ask me why) on the CIA World Factbook today and discovered a fascinating statistic…

Religions:
Buddhist 36%, Muslim 25%, Christian 18%, other 21% (1997)

On Xmas Island itself, Xians are a minority!

Is that cool or what??

  • Share/Bookmark

Study: Praying Won’t Affect Heart Patients

30 March 2006

Man, the Webernets are just awash with fun stuff today.

Study: Praying Won’t Affect Heart Patients

Snippet:

NEW YORK – Does praying for a sick person’s recovery do any good?

In the largest scientific test of its kind, heart surgery patients showed no benefit when strangers prayed for their recovery.

And patients who knew they were being prayed for had a slightly higher rate of complications. Doctors could only guess why.

Several scientists questioned the concept of the study.

Science “is not designed to study the supernatural,” said Dr. Harold G. Koenig, director of the Center for Spirituality, Theology and Health at the Duke University Medical Center.

The researchers emphasized that their $2.4 million study could not address whether God exists or answers prayers made on another’s behalf. The study could look only for an effect from the specific prayers offered as part of the research, they said.

The study “did not move us forward or backward” in understanding the effects of prayer, said Dr. Charles Bethea, a co-author and cardiologist at the Integris Baptist Medical Center in Oklahoma City. “Intercessory prayer under our restricted format had a neutral effect.”

Dr. Herbert Benson of Harvard Medical School, co-principal investigator of the study, agreed. “We cannot come to a conclusion, except to say that by this study design, with its limitations, this is what we found,” he said.

Researchers also said they didn’t know why patients who knew they were being prayed for had a higher rate of complications than patients who only knew that such prayers were a possibility.

Maybe they became anxious by the knowledge that they’d been selected for prayers, Bethea said: “Did the patients think, ‘I am so sick that they had to call in the prayer team?’”

They spent 2.4 million dollars on this shit?? They couldda just donated the money to GifS as a good cause. We wouldda told them before they spent a single penny that they were gonna discover jack and squat.

How hilarious that the patients who knew they were being prayed for got even sicker.

That goes back to what we have said to many a drive-by theist on this site: Don’t say you’re gonna pray for me, butt-munch. I am just fine without it.

  • Share/Bookmark

Holding Them Accountable

30 March 2006

Through sheer circumstance, I stumbled across this post on a blog. How refreshing. A thoughtful theist who doesn’t dismiss us outright as morally bankrupt because we don’t believe what they believe. Worth reading. She is, however, in the end still missing a good chunk of the point. Christianity, to those who know a bit of history, has already demonstrated itself to be “harsh, vindictive” and “unthinking.” All of the sky-god religions have, Judaism included.

Anyway, I disagree with many of her points (and the points made by her sources), but kudos to her for even giving us a glance. Most religios could give a flying fug what we think. I guess the book, and the article she references, were comforting to her. As if we atheists are going anywhere any time soon. ;-)

Atheism: Holding Us Accountable

In his recent book, The Twilight of Atheism (excerpted here), Alister McGrath praises atheism for what it does:

The greatest virtue of atheism is its moral seriousness—its criticisms and passionate demands for justice directed against the corruptions of, say, the French church of the 18th century.

The moral passion of atheism, especially when set alongside the laziness and complacency of European state churches in the 18th century, cannot be dismissed. Some Christian leaders at the time of the French Revolution saw that event as a divine judgment against a failing church. Some believed God was using the atheist critiques of the church as a means of reforming it.

Paradoxically, what propels people toward atheism is above all a sense of revulsion against the excesses and failures of organized religion. Atheism is ultimately a worldview of fear—a fear, often merited, of what might happen if religious maniacs were to take over the world.

McGrath also points out what atheism does not do. As one might expect of a negative philosophy–one based on what it is not, rather than on what it is–atheism, while fairly adept at criticizing belief in a Creator-God and a personality-steeped universe, can’t offer a viable alternative. McGrath says:

Reginald Le Sueur put his finger unerringly on the real point at issue: “The problem with humanism as such is that, although rational, secular, and ‘true,’ it is, in comparison with major religions, somewhat wishy-washy and just plain unexciting.”

Le Sueur recognizes atheism as derivative, its attraction residing primarily in what it denies rather than what it articulates as an alternative. So does atheism have a future?

No doubt it does—but not an especially distinguished or exciting future. Listen to John Updike: “Among the repulsions of atheism for me has been its drastic uninterestingness as an intellectual position.” I have to confess that I now share his catatonic sense of utter tedium when I reread some of the atheist works I once found fascinating as a teenager. They now seem simplistic, failing to engage with the complexities of human experience, and seriously out of tune with our postmodern culture.

Atheism must insist that its colorblind view accurately reflects reality. Most of us, however, see colors–some of us constantly, some in dazzling glimpses. Increasingly, people are refusing to pretend otherwise.

So will atheism fade quietly away? That depends. McGrath says:

The future of atheism will be determined by its religious rivals. Those atheists looking for a surefire way to increase their appeal need only to hope for harsh, vindictive, and unthinking forms of religion to arise in the West.

If he’s right, the future of atheism depends upon whether the religous among us exhibit harsh, vindictive, and unthinking forms of Christianity–colors so ugly and harsh that people draw back, close their eyes, pretend to see only gray. That terrifies me: Someone may close her eyes to Christ, so as not to see me.

Christians know that our sins are, every day, counted as Christ’s; God counts them so. We need to be mindful that the unbeliever counts them so as well.

  • Share/Bookmark

GifS A.V. Club: Matisyahu!

30 March 2006

I saw this dude on the Jimmy Kimmel show months ago and I knew he was gonna be a huge smash. Indeed, he has.

NEW YORK (AFP) – Matthew Miller cuts a striking figure on stage with his black hat and beard. The fervent Hasidic Jew better known as Matisyahu is also an unlikely rising star of reggae and rap.

The 26-year-old has reconciled strict religious demands with a staccato chant pop style that has taken his latest album “Youth” straight into the Billboard charts at number four with 120,000 copies sold in one week.

With the help of internet chat rooms, in a few months Matisyahu has gone from local shows to headlining national events. He will be one of the top names at the Lollapalooza festival in Chicago in August.

But no shows on a Friday, the eve of the Sabbath, and no fraternising with female fans. “There’s always one drunk girl who runs up to give me a hug. I have to pull away,” he said in a recent interview with Rolling Stone magazine.

Here’s the Kimmel clip, still one of the best live recordings of Matisyahu out there.

Never let it be said that secular humanists don’t like religious people. After all, how could a humanist say that certain humans aren’t of any worth? It’s not that we don’t like them, it’s that we don’t like their ideas.

  • Share/Bookmark