Comments on: Onward Armchair Soliders . . . Just in time for Xmas

By: Eve

Eve — Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:20:23 +0000

I don’t know, Marcus; it’s pretty fun at that size - gets the point across really well.

By: Lya Kahlo

Lya Kahlo — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 10:55:20 +0000

“Being anti-Christian right might not be a “bad thing” to you but it should tell you about the site’s bias.”

Being biased against hatemongering bigots is not a bad thing.

“And unlike Talk2Action, we allow people who disagree with us to engage us in debate by commenting on our blog. At Talk2Action, if you don’t tow their line, you are banned from the club.”

I have little experience with them. But, I won’t be taking the word of an apologist. So far I have seen nothing to show that this statement is true.

“I do to tell you who said the things. I refer readers to a gaming site that has reviews of the game. It is a secular site, not a Christian one. Much more dependable than a censor-prone anti-Christian rant.”

I don’t take the word of apologists. And as I clearly said I couldn’t get to your link, I fail to see why you think you’re just teling me it’s right is supposed to convince me. There’s no proof Talk2Action is anti-christian or censor-prone. So far there’s only proof that you wish to badmouth them.

“You are speaking from a lot of ignorance and apparrently feel justified in simply speculating the worst in order to justify falling for Talk2Action’s anti-Christian propoganda.”

You are speaking from a lot of ignorance and apparently feel justified in simply speculating the worst in order to justify presumptuous notions about me because you don’t like that there are people objecting to this asinine game. You came by to dazzle us with your “it ain’t so” posts and so far no one’s dazzled. Now, you’re getting insulting because you can’t have your way.

“Which is too bad, because a real discussion about the game — rather than paranoid ignorant pronouncements about it — might be a good thing.”

*lol* more presumptuous arrogant bullshit. This must be what happens when an apologist FAILS in debate.

By: Marcus

Marcus — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 20:47:40 +0000

Holy crap… I’m really going to have to make a smaller version of that.

By: CODY GOD LOVER

CODY GOD LOVER — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 16:24:40 +0000

I WOULD TAX ALL PEOPLE STANDING IN WATER!!! OOooOOOoO!!! YOU WILL ALL ROT IN HELL!!! HAVE FUN WITH STALIN AND HITLER!!!

By: Sean

Sean — Sat, 03 Jun 2006 06:24:34 +0000

Hey! Maybe the mysterious bulge under Dubya’s jacket during the debates was a kind of cilice??

By: stardust1954

stardust1954 — Sat, 03 Jun 2006 05:25:59 +0000

Raindog - that was great. LOL!

By: raindogzilla

raindogzilla — Sat, 03 Jun 2006 02:13:44 +0000

If I knew how to design a video game, I'd make one where some dude with two trained lions, tigers, or, better yet, ligers, hunts down wild, fish-headed Xians armed only with a Phillips Head screwdriver and a ballpeen hammer. The Xians have the chance to be deprogrammed at hammer point though they must pull a Constantine Copronymous and, from that day forward, wear both hairshirts and cilices in order to prove their new enlightenment.

By: Layman

Layman — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:36:44 +0000

Lyla,

I do to tell you who said the things. I refer readers to a gaming site that has reviews of the game. It is a secular site, not a Christian one. Much more dependable than a censor-prone anti-Christian rant.

You are speaking from a lot of ignorance and apparrently feel justified in simply speculating the worst in order to justify falling for Talk2Action’s anti-Christian propoganda.

Which is too bad, because a real discussion about the game — rather than paranoid ignorant pronouncements about it — might be a good thing.