The Obituarites:
David B. Ast, a New York dentist who helped show the effectiveness of fluoridated drinking water in preventing tooth decay, has died. He was 104.In 1944, Ast began a 10-year study of fluoridation that bolstered the use of fluoride in public drinking water to prevent tooth decay.
He selected two towns of similar size along the Hudson River, Newburgh and Kingston, and compared the health and dental records of their residents. During the study, Newburgh’s water was treated with fluoride compounds, while Kingston’s water was not.
The results showed that children in Newburgh had a 60 percent reduction in numbers of cavities between the ages of 6 and 9, and a nearly 70 percent reduction in cavities by the time they reached ages 12 to 14. Moreover, the study found no significant difference in the incidence of cancer, birth defects and heart or kidney disease between the two towns.
A random check of Google shows that this issue has not completely died down.
Read Flouride and Aggression, by Mary Sparrowdancer, of Tallahassee FL. She lists no degrees or other qualifications, and provides no links to substantiate her claims. At one point, she notes that, according to NIH, two-thirds of Americans are obese, and follows that sentence, in the same paragraph with a CDC report of two-thirds of Americans drink fluoridated water. Ergo…what? [Posted by Chris Gupta, in NewMediaExplorer blog.]
I couldn’t make that up–if I tried…
Howard V. Ramsey, Oregon’s last living World War I veteran, has died. He was 108.
But did he drink fluoridated water?
Is this really the last resting place of Jesus, Mary Magdalene - and their son?
If it really were the most important archaeological discovery in history, the point of truth came with very little song or dance. There was no drum roll or fanfare, just the sweeping aside of black felt drapes to reveal a pair of simple stone boxes sitting side by side.
(yawn)
But for the panel of film-makers, theologians and statisticians at New York’s public library yesterday, this really was the moment. As James Cameron, the director of the film Titanic who has lent his name to the project, said: “It doesn’t get bigger than this”.
The claim that Jesus was married to his disciple Mary Magdalene, that they had a child together in the style of the Da Vinci code, and that after his death he left behind his bones rather than being resurrected in the flesh elicited an outcry that was as instant as it was predictable. The American-based Catholic League dubbed the theory a “Titanic fraud”, saying that not a Lenten season goes by without some author or TV programme seeking to cast doubt on the divinity.
(yawn)
Mental Health News, Section 8
Brother and sister fight Germany’s incest laws
A German brother and sister are challenging the law against incest so that they can continue their relationship free from the threat of imprisonment.
Patrick Stübing, an unemployed locksmith, and his sister Susan have had four children together since starting a sexual relationship in 2000. Three of the children are in foster care, and two have unspecified disabilities.
Betcha didn’t know this, from the same source:
Napoleon abolished France’s incest laws in 1810. Neither is it a crime in the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium, Portugal or Turkey. Japan, Argentina and Brazil have also legalised it in recent years.
Incest is forbidden in Britain, where the law was extended in 2002 to include not just those with blood ties, but also step-parents and their children and in cases of adoptions.
Whoa!
News From Around the World
From Syria: May God Help Iraq’s Scientists
Have U.S. forces intentionally created an environment dangerous to Iraqi scientists in order to, ‘control the people, their thoughts and their scientific pursuits?’ According to this op-ed article from Syria’s state-controlled Al-Wehda newspaper, while the U.S. is chiefly at fault, Arabs aren’t without blame for the catastrophe that has befallen what was once the Arab World’s most advanced nation.
A little over-the-top, but they’re on the right track.
From South Korea: We Must Learn to Do Without the U.S.
South Korea’s security faces a potential crisis from a Feb. 13 pact reached in six-nation denuclearization talks, because the U.S. is moving in the direction of leaving South Korea under threat from North Korea’s existing nuclear weapons and materials. Our security hangs in the balance. The U.S. may deny it, but we feel betrayed by America.
George W. Bush may have betrayed South Korea, but the US hasn’t.
From France: Europe and the CIA: In Fear of the Truth
Up to now, criticism of the American commitment in Iraq - which is the key element of the global offensive against terrorism initiated by George W. Bush - only had practical political consequences in the United States. If sensitive to the sound of the bugle [the call to war] and with respect to its detractors – America is primarily a democratic country in which those who support Bush one day, when confronted with the undeniable facts, can repudiate him the next.
They weren’t reading the rightwing blogs, were they?
Comics:
What! That wasn’t funny enough for you? You want comics, too?



Holy crap, just cover all bases, huh?
A German brother and sister are challenging the law against incest so that they can continue their relationship free from the threat of imprisonment.
What’s that old saying? “The family that plays together stays together?”
EEEEWWW!
I agree. GROSS.
Also, wouldn’t the UAE have been considered greatly more “advanced” than Iraq?
Much love and heathen props to Naomi - the one woman godless posting machine!
Great stuff. Thank you.
To Naomi great news.
The mystery about jeebus burial place is now solved. I read some were there were twelve foreskins from jeebus and i do solve this mistery because i had a meeting at my paradise with him, http://picasaweb.google.com/saskfarm were many people come and look at my landscaping of 15 acre.I asked jeebus how he could have twelve foreskins and he told me he liked his dickey were he was born with and just created a miracle and grow a new foreskin after they circumcised him. I don’t know if you like this joke but i do.
This is the same kind of activism exhibited by Rachel Carson when she practically single-handedly led to the ban on DDT in the US and consequently much of the rest of the world. She had zero scientific evidence to support any of her claims, only emotion. Since then tens of millions have died of mosquito-borne malaria in so-called third world countries, mainly africa. That number could have been dramatically reduced with the judicious use of DDT.
At the risk of getting poked in the eye with a sharp stick, Al Gore is using the same kind of emotional tactics in promoting catastrophic global warming. None of the science supports the extremes laid out in his science-fiction fantasy, oh, sorry, “documentary”, film about global warming. Take, for example, Sea Level rise. Gore says sea levels could rise as much as 20 feet within our lifetimes. Even the IPCC’s report gives an upper end of 43 centimeters of sea level rise by 2100 (which is still MUCH higher than observed rates over the last 100 years.) Gore inflates this by about 2000%.
My sentiments, Rev. I miss “preview comments”, too. If it wasn’t for my ability to edit as a contributor, you’d see more errors in my comments as well!
Here, let me fix that for you…
What is the problem with incest if they do not make babies?
I mean, I would never sleep with my sister (not even if she were a man), but if two responsible, educated adults, who know what they are doing, who have options, free-willingly decide to sleep together and not make a baby, that is none of my business.
A very sad story of someone who wasn’t saved from tooth decay: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17372104
VL: OMG! Most don’t die, but it’s a hidden problem, isn’t it? Something so little but with huge implications…
I wonder, now, about how many in poverty are drinking unfluoridated well water?
Similarly, dental problems cause more than just teeth loss:
Also mentioned in the article, but not listed in the above quote, are bone diseases.
Did you floss today?
Excuse me, I’ll be right back…
Revenant…Just wondering…
Where do you get YOUR scientific data from? Do you have a Bibliograghy related to your claims…Scientifically valid names and studies, etc.? And of course, how much academic science have YOU studied. I realize most of us are not research scientists here; so it’s easy for us to make opinionated claims…pro and con!
I haven’t seen Gore’s documentary film yet, so I ‘reserve’ final, critical comment…for now!
Maybe it won’t ultimately matter anyway…whatever we do…isn’t there a huge asteroid heading our way, due around 2038? I’ll be dead long before that; and have no kids…why the fuck should I care?
“What! Fuck the Polar Bears and Penguins!…
On second thought…fuck everyone!”
Right, Naomi?
Vast left…Thanks for the interesting link!
Unfortunately, there’s no help for adults, either…regarding dental access. Everyone, for that matter, needs dental care; and if you don’t have BIG bucks these days…you’re essentially…fucked. [More debt?] Dental care is extremely expensive, and in Illinois, where I live, there’s practically NOTHING covered under Medicare or Medicaid. Even the University of Illinois’ Dental School charges half of what the average dentist charges; and one has to pay up-front for any work done…IF you’re accepted as a patient! We USED to have Northwestern U.; where I had quite a bit of dental work done[ some 30 years ago!] for about 1/3 of regular dentist’s charges.
Of course, with increasing age, it all compounds for poor people and those on Social Security, etc.
In my opinion, ACCESS to health care in the U.S. is a disgrace. Due to the ever-increasing gap between the Rich and Poor, more and more people are falling through the ‘cracks’ regarding medical and dental care.
It has nothing to do with the technology.. in my opinion, it has to do, at least in part, with MULTI-LEVEL GREED, for one…and the country being run by the so-called “Compassionate Conservative” hypocrites. Bush, for example, wouldn’t really know “Compassion”, if it bit him on his ‘Testament’!
People who NEVER ONCE in their life, ever had to really worry about whether they could AFFORD to pay a Health and/or Dental Insurance premium, are not really going to understand what poorer people face on a daily basis…all through their lives.
[It’s just another reason, I’m cynical about the human race!]
Tooth DESIGN?…fuck!…we should be growing NEW teeth every ‘X’ number of years!
Hmmm…another challenge for stem cell research?
Yeah: “Why I oughta!”
ChuckA
I couldnt agree more! Even being military my dental bills are through the roof! I am having a LOT of dental work done due to having TMJ. MY whole jaw has to be realigned. And even the simple stuff is costing hundrends per tooth. Unfucking believable! I cant imagine how many poor people who have the same problems(cause it is a very common problem)are going to manage to get a very painful problem and if left unfixed, a problem that can cause teeth decay and loss, treated!?!
I know a lot of people cringe at the thought of socialist, but I am a socialist when it comes to medical! Medical care is NOT a luxury and shouldnt be only for the rich! EVERY CHILD DESERVES GOOD MEDICAL CARE!!
Naomi
Thanks for the new updates with a sense of humor.
say no to christ: “EVERY CHILD DESERVES GOOD MEDICAL CARE!!”
In conjuntion to my previous comment, I’d ammend that to:
EVERY PERSON DESERVES GOOD MEDICAL CARE!!…that is…if you want to live in a relatively healthy society.
I agree, completely, with your comment that Health Care should be handled under a ’socialist’ concept. [I would put that with basic Social Security as well.]
After all, those who are outside the Health Care system can effect everyone else, when it comes to disease. In other words..even the (”I’ve got mine, fuck you!”) very rich can fall prey to the poor’s non treated communicable diseases, etc.
We’re all in this ‘Societal Jungle’ together.
As y’all know…anything like blood tests, X-ray procedures, etc. are VERY expensive out of pocket costs. Yada, yada…
And I’m sure you’re well aware of how your local hospitals end up passing on the high cost bill for emergency room care for the ‘indigent’.
So, without a more RATIONAL approach…
health care costs keep sky-rocketing; with an additional “for profit” Insurance Industry middleman to help accelerate the ‘fucking everyone over’.
[”WHAT?…RATIONAL?…in THIS DELUDED, BELIEVER (by the crotch) WORLD??? ChuckA…Are you some kind of Freethinking atheist swine, or something?”]…
Here’s my brief look at the current (U.S.) Multi-level, Greedy formula (with each element having its own, private, bureaucracy (paperwork)!):
Doctors, Nurses, Taxes(?), Private Insurance Companies, Ever-expanding hospitals, Medical Equipment Suppliers, Profiteering Drug Companies, [_______ = your additions?]
Yeah…kinda like George Carlin’s:…
“Bend over while we service your account!”
OR…
“Oh?…you DON’T have insurance?…erm…pull your panties (or pants) up!”
“Nice ass, though!…As far as you know…you have no sexual diseases, right?…
so…what’s your phone number? I just might be able to service YOUR account…
privately!”
OK…I was being naughty…I’ll revise that: ;( overall!
In rebuttal to REV’s offhand comment about Rachel Carson, I quote the relevant section of the Wikipedia article on her:
==============================================
Starting in the mid-1940s, Carson became concerned about the use of newly invented pesticides, especially DDT. “The more I learned about the use of pesticides, the more appalled I became,” she wrote later, explaining her decision to start researching what would eventually become her most famous work, Silent Spring. “What I discovered was that everything which meant most to me as a naturalist was being threatened, and that nothing I could do would be more important.”
Silent Spring focused on the environment, and pesticides in particular. It was known as Carson’s crusade, and she worked on this book till death. Carson explored the subject of environmental connectedness: although a pesticide is aimed at eliminating one organism, its effects are felt throughout the food chain, and what was intended to poison an insect ends up poisoning larger animals and humans.
The four-year task of writing Silent Spring began with a letter from a close friend of Carson’s. It was from a New Englander, Olga Owens Huckins, who owned a bird sanctuary. According to the letter, the sanctuary had been sprayed unmercifully by the government. The letter asked Carson to immediately use her influence with government authorities to begin an investigation into pesticide use. Carson decided it would be more effective to raise the issue in a popular magazine; however, publishers were uninterested, and eventually the project became a book instead.
Now, as a renowned author, she was able to ask for (and receive) the aid of prominent biologists, chemists, pathologists, and entomologists. She used Silent Spring to create a mental association in the public’s mind between wildlife mortality and over-use of pesticides like dieldrin, toxaphene, and heptachlor. Her cautions regarding the previously little-remarked practices of introducing an enormous variety of industrial products and wastes into wilderness, waterways, and human habitats with little concern for possible toxicity struck the general public as common sense, as much as good science; “We are subjecting whole populations to exposure to chemicals which animal experiments have proved to be extremely poisonous and in many cases cumulative in their effects. These exposures now begin at or before birth and - unless we change our methods - will continue through the lifetime of those now living.”
Even before Silent Spring was published by Houghton Mifflin in 1962, there was strong opposition to it. As Time Magazine recounted in 1999:
Carson was violently assailed by threats of lawsuits and derision, including suggestions that this meticulous scientist was a “hysterical woman” unqualified to write such a book. A huge counterattack was organized and led by Monsanto, Velsicol, American Cyanamid - indeed, the whole chemical industry - duly supported by the Agriculture Department as well as the more cautious in the media.
Scientists such as American Cyanamid’s Robert White-Stevens (who wrote “If man were to follow the teachings of Miss Carson, we would return to the Dark Ages, and the insects and diseases and vermin would once again inherit the earth.”[1]), chemical companies, and other critics attacked the data and interpretation in the book. Some went further to attack Carson’s scientific credentials because her speciality was marine biology and zoology, not the field of biochemistry. Some went as far as characterizing her as a mere birdwatcher with more spare time than scientific background, calling her unprofessional. A fringe of her critics even accused her of being a communist.
In addition, many critics repeatedly asserted that she was calling for the elimination of all pesticides despite the fact that Carson had made it clear she was not advocating the banning or complete withdrawal of helpful pesticides, but was instead encouraging responsible and carefully managed use with an awareness of the chemicals’ impact on the entire ecosystem. In fact, she concludes her section on DDT in Silent Spring not by urging a total ban, but with Practical advice should be “Spray as little as you possibly can” rather than “Spray to the limit of your capacity.” [2]
Houghton Mifflin was pressured to suppress the book, but did not succumb. Silent Spring was positively reviewed by many outside of the agricultural and chemical science fields, and it became a runaway best seller both in the USA and overseas. Again, Time Magazine claimed that, within a year or so of publication, “all but the most self-serving of Carson’s attackers were backing rapidly toward safer ground. In their ugly campaign to reduce a brave scientist’s protest to a matter of public relations, the chemical interests had only increased public awareness.” [3]
Pesticide use became a major public issue, helped by Carson’s April 1963 appearance on a CBS TV special in debate with a chemical company spokesman. Later that year she was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and received many other honors and awards, including the Audubon Medal and the Cullen Medal of the American Geographical Society.
Carson received hundreds of speaking invitations, but was unable to accept the great majority of them. Her health had been steadily declining since she had been diagnosed with breast cancer halfway through the writing of Silent Spring. In one of her last public appearances, Carson testified before President Kennedy’s Science Advisory Committee, which issued a report on May 15 1963 largely backing Carson’s scientific claims(http://www.nwhp.org/tlp/biographies/carson/carson-bio.html). However, she never did live to see the banning of DDT in U.S. She died on 14 April 1964, at the age of 56. In 1980, she was posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest civilian honor in the USA.
============================================
She was a scientist, her book was based on research, not “pure emotion”.
–JJR
That’s a pretty biased article, but then that’s Wikipedia.
Show me the peer-reviewed research which supports any of the claims against DDT. That should settle any argument.