Just wanted to remind everyone about the SCOTUS case today…
Supreme Court takes up church-state case
Wednesday, the US Supreme Court takes up a case that examines to what extent those opponents have legal standing to file federal lawsuits alleging that the White House’s faith-based initiative amounts to unconstitutional entanglement of church and state. […] Although the case revolves around the esoteric issue of taxpayer standing to sue, analysts say the case could foreshadow a shift in the Supreme Court’s church-state jurisprudence. It marks the first opportunity for the high court to rule in a major religion case since the retirement of key swing voter Sandra Day O’Connor and the addition of Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Samuel Alito. […] In most instances taxpayers lack legal standing to sue the government merely because they object to how the government is spending tax dollars. Instead, the courts require that someone suffer a direct and personal injury that entitles them to sue. This requirement of legal standing helps prevent the courts from becoming a quasi-legislature where policy arguments are debated rather than a forum to decide specific legal disputes. […] But in 1968 the Supreme Court carved out an exception that allows taxpayers to file establishment-clause lawsuits challenging congressional spending that benefits religion. […] The Bush administration is arguing that the 1968 exception only permits taxpayer lawsuits challenging appropriations by Congress that raise church-state concerns. The portion of the faith-based initiative under challenge is an activity of the executive branch that does not involve outlays of government money earmarked to religious groups.
As you might imagine, given the recent changes on SCOTUS, I’m not all that optimistic — and I have a feeling that the faith-based crap will just be endorsed.
But hey, I’m just old and cynical…

Frankly, I’m worried about what the rightwing of the SCOTUS will do. Being in the pockets of Bush/et.al. is a real threat to the intent of the Founding Fathers. And it will be a slap in the face if they weaken “The Wall”.
The RR justices are religious extremists and in bed with the christianists. And they’re not just sharing the bed–they’re actively pleasuring each other, to mutual satisfaction!
You know, typing that was okay but as I proofed it, I experienced real nausea! Yuck!
I think we’re the ones being screwed…
Yeah, I’m worried about this too.
Although it would be nice if the Supreme Court also ruled that the income tax was unconstitutional, because, you know, the 16th was never ratified, and there is no law saying you need to pay income taxes.
AUM, you have a better chance with this SCOTUS than with any past one or any future one.
My guess is you’re a Libertarian who has read The Law That NEVER Was!, by Bill Benson. It has become a bible to Libertarians, who deplore taxation.
At the risk of alienating another atheist, I suggest you carefully read the definitive answer on the subject. Mr. Siegel has been asked this question so many times, he has posted the “complete answer” to his personal blog. He concludes the post with this::
I don’t particularly enjoy paying taxes either. However, there are “common welfare” items intended in the Constitution that I depend on and share with all Americans. They have never been “gratis”–and they wouldn’t even exist if the far-rightwing and neocons have anything to say about it…
Here’s the latest news:
Bush’s faith-based program debated in court
I fear the final outcome of all this will be defeat…
THAT doesn’t sound good, does it?
I wonder if Ginsberg can woo him with “cookies”?
Just asking…
Stardust:
The SC is 56% RC. Was it Scalia who whined about how ‘tiresome’ the SOCAS was?
Right. Like the chief chimp listens to anyone outside of his cabal of cronies.
I think I might need to go back to sleep. I initially read that as SCROTUM case. Ok, I will get coffee and read the SCOTUS case. (I might need new glasses as well.)
I think I might need to go back to sleep. I initially read that as SCROTUM case. Ok, I will get coffee and read the SCOTUS case. (I might need new glasses as well.)
beepbeep —
Naomi, actually I don’t know what I am. I’ve never read that book, but I’m following the Cryer case, where he refused to pay taxes, the IRS could not show him the law, and then the feds ruined his life.
As far as political affliation goes, I’m on the fence between Libertarian and Socialist.
As such, I have nothing against common welfare. I would be perfectly happy to pay taxes if we weren’t lied to about the law, and if we could make absolutely certain our tax money went to benefit the common welfare.
However, I don’t think the government should take my money so the politicians can use it every which way BUT which benefits America and Americans.
I’m set to make only 500 dollars a month, and 100 of that will be taken away by the black hole that is our government. That 100 dollars could have gone towards important things, like medicine and insurance for myself. As I’m single I don’t have to provide for anyone but myself, but still, that 100 bucks would be great to have in an emergency.
Instead, it will go towards building more weapons to kill more of the innocents that just happen to live on rich oil deposits, or innocents that Israel happen to not like. If that 100 dollars a month went to helping the poor find jobs, get them decent housing, or help provide insurance to others, I’d happily give it up.
On that topic (here comes Socialism), I hate how the money grubbers running businesses today punish the working class by raising their prices well beyond what is necessary when a minimum wage increase is given. By doing so, they make the increase irrelevant, and devalue the American dollar at the same time.
Too bad our government won’t do dick to stop that, but then, most of the people in our government don’t know what it’s like to work a minimum wage job. This government is a rich man’s government and fuck the rest of us.
That’s why a good majority of the military are desperate lower and middle class. It’s a poor man’s military to fight a rich man’s war.
I hate the war in Iraq and this bullshit war on terror because the trillions (what’s higher than a trillon?) we’re going to end up spending on Neocon conquest could be turned back into this country and insure the 40+ million without health insurance, or provide some type of housing for our half a million homeless.
But then, whenever I point this out, I will be labelled a socialist or a communist, and be told that’s unAmerican. I suppose spending billions to make weapons to blow up children is very much the American way? I suppose it’s perfectly fine since it’s not us the weapons are being used on… yet.
And I realize I’m rambling. I apologize. When I get on a soap box it’s hard to get me off of it. So in closing, I absolutely hate what this government has become. And yes, I draw a distinction between hating the GOVERNMENT and hating the PEOPLE. I can still love my country but hate my government.
Oh, and Naomi, the 16th Amendment was never legally ratified. It was short by two states. Of course, no one ever used the word ratified either. They used the phrase “in effect.”
AtheistUnderMask:
“I hate the war in Iraq and this bullshit war on terror because the trillions (what’s higher than a trillon?) we’re going to end up spending on Neocon conquest.”
YES! In my opinion, war has always been used, in ALL cultures, to profit the very elite; whom, in these days, in particular, almost never get their OWN offspring killed or mamed. There are humongous profits to be made producing and selling weaponry. It’s part of the human race’s total insanity. Just think of all the world’s stockpiles of weapons rusting away; and in the case of nuclear…dangerously poluting the planet for millenia. What a total waste…and blatant example of total “cosmic” insanity!
I’ve long felt, that anyone who participates in that endeavor deserves whatever “karma” ensues.
(Pardon my New Age hangover…wait…what about the golden rule, huh? OK, fuck it!)
As to “what’s higher than a million”…I always defer to “gazillion”…Let’s face it, whatever you call it; practically speaking, you can’t really imagine it, anyway!
As to your…
“And I realize I’m rambling. I apologize. When I get on a soap box it’s hard to get me off of it.”…Ramble on…with no apology necessary, either! I’m as ‘guilty’ as the next ‘guy’ on that account.
Hey…wait a minute!…GUILT?…Fuck guilt!
As to a soap box…
I’m an old Chicagoan, who remembers at least as far back as the 1950s, a near North side park called “Bughouse Square”; where people used to LITERALY stand on soap boxes to complain about nearly everything from politics to probably even their kitchen sink!
[It probably dated back, at least, to the days of “Prohibition” or the Great Depression! (Hmmm…Wikipedia?)]
I think its use faded out sometime after the Vietnam Era, though…I used to park my car around there for certain downtown Chicago musical ‘gigs’, and never saw much action on the weekends, post-1970s.
[Why do I suspect that the Reagan Era killed it?]
Anyway AUM; I think I agree with just about everything you ‘mini-ranted’ about.
I say…express YOUR truth, without fear and guilt!
This is GifS, after all…not some oppressive mind fucking site!
LET FREEDOM RING!!!
(takes deep breath!…
cough, cough!)
Thanks Chuck. My parents always tell me to calm down and I always say I can’t because when you calm down, nothing gets done.
I have no guilt or fear about expressing my truth, I just have a problem with not getting very intense. I apologized only due to length and off topic.
I’ve ben doing some missionary work to convert my family members to the logic based belief system side. Lets just hope the mindset spreads.
OT alert!
ChuckA, thanks to Tony Blair’s effort to establish a police state in the UK, the very unique location in London, called “Hyde Park Corner” was one of those “soapbox” places. Now, you can’t protest anywhere within a half mile of the Parliament.
Also, you could use Kew Gardens, like we use Central Park, NYC. But not anymore. Oops! Too close to Parliament. Henry Potter, in the Guardian/UK’s “Blair’s Big Brother Legacy”, described a “non-protest” that was watched carefully by the Scotland Yard. Four people had a silent “tea party” with large posters that were totally blank. They mimed their way through their tea party, then quietly packed up their things and left, leaving the Bobbies with nothing to show for their time. Potter finished describing the scene by saying, “Winston Church must be spinning in his grave.” (The article was also published in Vanity Fair magazine.)
There goes the neighborhood…and freedom of speech, and assembly, and redress of grievances. Soon separation and establishment may go, too.
___
Jimmy Dean, best of luck! Will you keep us posted? We desperately need to hear about some successes.
Don’t forget of the press too, Naomi. What with sources and reporters getting arrested for publishing information that the Bush gestapo doesn’t like, and myself getting censored in a SCHOOL NEWSPAPER for writing an article exposing Israel’s influence behind our attack on Iraq and our upcoming attack on Iran.
The last article we had to write was on censorship. I wrote one and then black highlighted out everything. Suffice to say, it was never published. I hope the journalism teacher got my point.
AUM, that was a beautifully sneaky bit of snark! I imagine the teacher knew what it was about but wasn’t brave enough to print it. It seems that few in that position are brave enough to buck the conservative culture in school administrations…
Well the sad thing was that not only did everyone in the journalism class read it, and EVERY SINGLE STUDENT had nothing but positive comments, and they all told me they agree with me, but the teacher also PROMISED ME that both articles would see print.
My first article had over 40 sources from many international and reputable newspapers and sources. The second only around 20, 25.
Yet the journalism teacher once picked up a Star Wars novel I was reading and announced something along the lines of this is why you can’t tell the difference between fantasy and reality. Wonder what’s she saying now that the Bush regime is gearing up for another invasion based on lies in Iran… just like I said they would more than a YEAR AGO.
She also praised someone who wrote some stupid little kiss ass article as the best writer in the class. I guess it’s easy to be the best writer when you aren’t destroying the teacher’s opinions.
Obviously she never heard the comments from my fellow classmates. Of course, no one criticizes Israel and gets away with it.
I also asked around the school and most of the people in the school said they’d rather read an article that had something important to say about the real world than some unimportant story about something at the school, or that REM deprivation causes insanity.
The only article I got printed was a tiny ass thing about Spanish club that also got a negative reaction from the teacher. Simply put, I went in that class to put some published material in a writing portfolio. What I got out of it was a hatred for journalism, a better understanding of the bias in journalism, and absolutely nothing to show for it as far as my portfolio goes.
Said thing is the teacher was always bitching about the higher ups looking over her shoulder and trying to censor the paper. Too bad she’s a fucking hypocrite.
But that’s okay, when I’m writing movie scripts she’ll still be teaching at a community college… AND I’ll end up being proven right.
Go, Matt! Hope your script on Greek mythology is going well (see, I remember GifSters’ comments like that!)…