<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religious &#8220;discipline&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/</link>
	<description>Commentary, news, and rants on the evils and stupidity of belief in the big invisible daddy in the sky.  Illuminating and watchdogging the widespread attempts to institutionalize the theocratic rule of the US. Making fun of believers everywhere.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stardust</title>
		<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/#comment-268601</link>
		<dc:creator>Stardust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 14:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/#comment-268601</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Verdict is back - both guilty on all counts. Happy holidays!&lt;/em&gt;

Yay...justice prevails!
They probably look at it as persecution and see themselves as some kind of imprisoned martyrs. :roll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Verdict is back - both guilty on all counts. Happy holidays!</em></p>
<p>Yay&#8230;justice prevails!<br />
They probably look at it as persecution and see themselves as some kind of imprisoned martyrs. <img src='http://gods4suckers.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/#comment-268595</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 13:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/#comment-268595</guid>
		<description>Verdict is back - both guilty on all counts. Happy holidays!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verdict is back - both guilty on all counts. Happy holidays!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/#comment-268580</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 10:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/#comment-268580</guid>
		<description>The pair are nutters! They have been handing out "The Book of Mormon" to the solicitors, security staff, barristers and ushers at the court where the trial is. I hate it when people try to force religion upon you. 
Jury is out on the trial now. Expect a verdict today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pair are nutters! They have been handing out &#8220;The Book of Mormon&#8221; to the solicitors, security staff, barristers and ushers at the court where the trial is. I hate it when people try to force religion upon you.<br />
Jury is out on the trial now. Expect a verdict today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirula</title>
		<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/#comment-268118</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/#comment-268118</guid>
		<description>Why should anyone be allowed to do something to a child that would be considered a criminal act if done to a non-consenting adult JUST because the victims are children (smaller and defenseless)?  If anything, one would think the judicial system would have been structured with more flexibility for adult-on-adult violence than for adult-on-child.

Slap an adult whose behavior you don't like and see where that lands you.  Or use a weapon like a bat (rolling pin) and find out how many more years that can add to your sentence.

Sick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should anyone be allowed to do something to a child that would be considered a criminal act if done to a non-consenting adult JUST because the victims are children (smaller and defenseless)?  If anything, one would think the judicial system would have been structured with more flexibility for adult-on-adult violence than for adult-on-child.</p>
<p>Slap an adult whose behavior you don&#8217;t like and see where that lands you.  Or use a weapon like a bat (rolling pin) and find out how many more years that can add to your sentence.</p>
<p>Sick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni</title>
		<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/#comment-268020</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/#comment-268020</guid>
		<description>I am guessing these women are not part of the mainstream LDS church, I am betting that they are members of one of the fundamentalist LDS faiths.  They are probably polygamists. 

Mind you I am not defending the LDS church, just stating that these women are probably FLDS.  I wish I could see better what they are wearing.  I am betting it is a dress and they probably have long straight hair.  

Living around here you get good at spotting the fundamentalist polygamists.  Long old fashioned dresses, long straight hair.  No make-up, and depending on age, at least 5 kids with them and one on the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am guessing these women are not part of the mainstream LDS church, I am betting that they are members of one of the fundamentalist LDS faiths.  They are probably polygamists. </p>
<p>Mind you I am not defending the LDS church, just stating that these women are probably FLDS.  I wish I could see better what they are wearing.  I am betting it is a dress and they probably have long straight hair.  </p>
<p>Living around here you get good at spotting the fundamentalist polygamists.  Long old fashioned dresses, long straight hair.  No make-up, and depending on age, at least 5 kids with them and one on the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Moore</title>
		<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/#comment-267599</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/#comment-267599</guid>
		<description>I'm a "right wing" Christian fundamentalist.  

&lt;strong&gt;Ok...that and the rest of what you wrote is in blatant violation of our comment policy

This post has broken a GifS Commandment:  Thou shall not proselytize.  Read
Comment Policy Guidelines, for reference.  Mods&lt;/strong&gt;


Check my website

&lt;strong&gt;Fuck your website.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a &#8220;right wing&#8221; Christian fundamentalist.  </p>
<p><strong>Ok&#8230;that and the rest of what you wrote is in blatant violation of our comment policy</p>
<p>This post has broken a GifS Commandment:  Thou shall not proselytize.  Read<br />
Comment Policy Guidelines, for reference.  Mods</strong></p>
<p>Check my website</p>
<p><strong>Fuck your website.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beepbeepitsme</title>
		<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/#comment-267596</link>
		<dc:creator>beepbeepitsme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/#comment-267596</guid>
		<description>When you are a religious fundamentalist, the actions of these women are viewed as a "loving act."  Weird, I know, but let's face it, what fundie doesn't believe in "tough love"?

It speaks to the psychology of what they believe about god.  God is love and therefore any action of that god is a loving act - he is just torturing you for your own good. (That is the kind of thinking process I think they have.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you are a religious fundamentalist, the actions of these women are viewed as a &#8220;loving act.&#8221;  Weird, I know, but let&#8217;s face it, what fundie doesn&#8217;t believe in &#8220;tough love&#8221;?</p>
<p>It speaks to the psychology of what they believe about god.  God is love and therefore any action of that god is a loving act - he is just torturing you for your own good. (That is the kind of thinking process I think they have.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stardust</title>
		<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/#comment-267587</link>
		<dc:creator>Stardust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2007/04/29/religious-discipline/#comment-267587</guid>
		<description>I am wondering how these women came to have custody of these children. The article doesn't say if the kids are related to either woman, and doesn't say if they were foster kids, or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am wondering how these women came to have custody of these children. The article doesn&#8217;t say if the kids are related to either woman, and doesn&#8217;t say if they were foster kids, or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
