Atheist Nation? Ben Stein Botches The Blandishment

30 September 2007 by KA

CreationismBothTheories

“Equal rights for all, special privileges for none” - Jefferson

I’ve been reading about Ben Stein (you remember this guy? Visine commercials? Ferris Bueller’s Day Off? He’s got a lotta accomplishments racked up) over at Pharyngula, mostly about his shenanigans vis-a-vis that ridiculous new piece of dreck, Expelled.

As the goodly professor Myers puts it, “Did you know that ’scientists are not allowed to even think thoughts that involve an intelligent creator’”?

I wasn’t aware that such an invention as a patented mind-reader had been developed. Or perchance the US government is in cahoots with them thar durn nasty ole ‘evilutionists’?

The short version is “WAAHHH! Why won’t these big frelling meanies let OUR side of the story be heard?”

Shorter response: “Science. Not a democracy. Never has been.”

So, I was scoping out Snopes.com, when I stumbled across this sow’s ear (I borrowed the snippet in toto from this message board as Snopes seems to have some kind of anti-paste ‘n copy thing on their website):

Herewith at this happy time of year, a few confessions from my beating heart:
I have no freaking clue who Nick and Jessica are. I see them on the cover of People and Us constantly when I am buying my dog biscuits and kitty litter. I often ask the checkers at the grocery stores. They never know who Nick and Jessica are either. Who are they? Will it change my life if I know who they are and why they have broken up?

Well, I’ve not a clue who Nick is, but I know who Jessica is (I’m assuming Simpson?). And while I’m something of an intellectual snob, my eyes light up when that little ditty from that dreck ‘Dukes of Hazard’ comes on - you guys know what I mean, right? I can’t stand country western, but there’s something so…hypnotic about those gyrations.

Anyways, moving on. No, life goes on, despite the vicarious thrills of the tabloids for the duller amongst us.

Why are they so important? I don’t know who Lindsay Lohan is, either, and I do not care at all about Tom Cruise’s wife.

Ditto. I’ve already forgotten Cruise’s trophy ‘I’m not gay’ wife’s name, anyways.

Am I going to be called before a Senate committee and asked if I am a subversive? Maybe, but I just have no clue who Nick and Jessica are. Is this what it means to be no longer young. It’s not so bad.

I can get along with that.

Next confession: I am a Jew, and every single one of my ancestors was Jewish. And it does not bother me even a little bit when people call those beautiful lit up, bejeweled trees Christmas trees. I don’t feel threatened. I don’t feel discriminated against. That’s what they are: Christmas trees. It doesn’t bother me a bit when people say, “Merry Christmas” to me. I don’t think they are slighting me or getting ready to put me in a ghetto. In fact, I kind of like it. It shows that we are all brothers and sisters celebrating this happy time of year. It doesn’t bother me at all that there is a manger scene on display at a key intersection near my beach house in Malibu.

I’m down with most of that: but if that manger scene’s on government property, I think that’s a violation of SOCAS - that is, unless there’s equal time for Ramadan, Hanukkah, and other varied superstitions.

If people want a creche, it’s just as fine with me as is the Menorah a few hundred yards away.

Curious: I’ve never heard of public displays of Menorahs.

I don’t like getting pushed around for being a Jew and I don’t think Christians like getting pushed around for being Christians.

No one should be pushed around for any such thing - that’s (one of) the great things about the U.S.A. Of course, they shouldn’t get special privileges either, regardless of their beliefs, or lack thereof.

Can you hear the bleating of the martyr yet? Here it comes…

I think people who believe in God are sick and tired of getting pushed around, period.

If by ‘pushed around’, you mean that they don’t get special treatment anymore, boo-fucking-hoo.

I have no idea where the concept came from that America is an explicitly atheist country.

I have no idea where you pulled that egregious bit of bullshit from: probably your ass, Bendy-Boy. We were founded on secular values, but most distinctly not atheist ones. In fact, both Locke and Paine were anything but pro-atheist (though Franklin had a bit of a correspondence with David Hume, as I understand it).

I can’t find it in the Constitution and I don’t like it being shoved down my throat.

Right back atcha, Bendy. Neither atheism nor theism are mentioned in the Constitution. Yeesh, for a fucking lawyer, you sure don’t understand the term objective.

Or maybe I can put it another way: where did the idea come from that we should worship Nick and Jessica and we aren’t allowed to worship God as we understand Him?

Probably the same fucking place people got the stupid idea that the European royalty ruled via divine fiat? People always need someone to look up to, live vicariously through, and otherwise drool because the grass always seems a little greener on the other side of the pasture. Worship away, Bendy-boy. Just do try to keep it to yourself a touch more, wouldja?

I guess that’s a sign that I’m getting old, too. But there are a lot of us who are wondering where Nick and Jessica came from and where the America we knew went to.

Or in the words of Ned Flanders: “I wish we lived in a place more like the America of yesteryear that only exists in the brains of us Republicans.”

Which America would that be? The suburban utopia of Ozzie and Harriet? Bad news, Bendy: that was a fictional show and nowhere near being reality. Obviously Bendy’s caught this godly glaucoma, the whiny carp of how ‘things were better in the good ole days!’

What do you expect, from a Republican as well as a Nixon apologist?

Until next week, the peanut gallery is closed. This is the Apostate, signing off.

Share/Save/Bookmark

13 comments to “Atheist Nation? Ben Stein Botches The Blandishment”

  1. Krystalline Apostate:

    Just so y’all know, the ‘peanut gallery’ comment was just a figure of speech (I borrowed it off’n Ropert & Ebert).

  2. oldnorseman:

    Isn’t it heartbreaking what Christians have to endure? If they represent something like 75-80% of the population and they are so downtrodden, they must be the dumbest 75-80% of any population in recorded history. Whine, whine, whine.

  3. Stardust:

    This post has been up for more than 12 hours, where is everyone?

  4. Barbiebrains:

    Stardust,

    I always enjoy KA’s posts but I am in the middle of writing a paper…Ben Stein’s platitudes are written with a specific audience in mind. If we add up the attributes, we get the big picture: glittery kitten sweaters, big Bibles, gas-guzzling goddamn-the-environment SUVS, poofy-hair, Febreze-sniffing, mommy’s valium-and-gin chocolate cake, bunnies…I think Ben’s writing suits his audience just fine. LOL! ; )

  5. Sarah:

    Good post, but ugh… I just don’t know what to say. I made the mistake of clicking on the link for “Expelled” and I read the blog.

    It was just fucking ridiculous. Allow me to share a quote: Under a new anti-religious dogmatism, scientists and educators are not allowed to even think thoughts that involve an intelligent creator.

    WHAT THE FUCK?!? When have we ever tried to stop people from thinking? Thinking for yourself and figuring things out on your own is a wonderful thing. You can think whatever the hell you want to! Your own thoughts are your own private affairs, no one is monitoring them!

    Sorry for the rant. This just pissed me off majorly. :|

  6. brodie:

    And to think I acutally watched his game show.

    I agree with oldnorsemen, how can a majority feel like they’re the ones being oppressed? They’ve got the president on their side! What more do they want, the right to kick us all out of the country?

  7. cry4turtles:

    With his fingernails-on-the-blackboard monotone voice, how can anyone endure listening to Bendy for more than say, 30 seconds? He’s less important than Nick and Jessica, and not nearly as hot.

  8. Sarge:

    Actually I have seen lighted Menorahs displayed here in town. Some of the ‘twice born’ seem to think these articles impinge on the ‘reason for the season’. An aunt of mine, for one. Some feel that “there should be an ordinance…”, and yet bristle about complaints about display of christian symbols on public property.

    But KA is quite correct, but that mindset harks back to something darker than Ozzie and Harriet. The sweatshop, peonage, coal and iron police, religion and society where underlings “knew their place”, brown nosed the uppers, kicked the unders, and were happy, dammit, happy.

  9. milukfrog:

    “Under a new anti-religious dogmatism, scientists and educators are not allowed to even think thoughts that involve an intelligent creator.”

    Heh heh. How ’bout an unintelligent creator?

  10. Stardust:

    Heh heh. How ’bout an unintelligent creator?

    milkufrog, “uninteligent creator/designer” would be more like it (if we assume a god exists). Look at all the defects in things such as conjoined twins, babies born without brains and missing limbs, mental retardation, and other birth defects that happen to not only humans, but to innocent animals, as well.

    Any explanation a god believer can make up would only prove that their god is a sadistic dick. (Of course we know in reality these things are just accidents in nature…something going wrong in the development process.)

  11. Sarah:

    Any explanation a god believer can make up would only prove that their god is a sadistic dick.

    Agreed wholeheartedly. Human suffering sucks. Instead of arguing about whether their god really created them or not, they should use a little bit of that compassion that they preach and start trying to make life better for their fellow man, regardless of his or her beliefs, race, or sexual orientation.

  12. Eve:

    RAmen, preach it, Brother Apostate!

  13. Revenant:

    Always though Ben was an intelligent guy, but apparently he’s just a fucktard.