God is for suckers
Commentary, news, and rants on the evils and stupidity of belief in the big invisible daddy in the sky. Illuminating and watchdogging the widespread attempts to institutionalize the theocratic rule of the US. Making fun of believers everywhere.
January 31st, 2008

Too late for what?

the end
This cartoon caught my eye because of all the drive by comments I have deleted in the past couple years of blogging telling me I must accept Jesus and god because the “end is near” and soon it will be “too late”. I have also had this discussion with Christians in person:
“Too late for what?” I ask.
“Too late to repent!” they answer.
“What do I have to repent for?”
“Repent and ask forgiveness of your sins!”
“What sins do I need to be forgiven for?”
(pause while they think of a response)
“Only you and god knows what you need to be forgiven for, but you need to accept Jesus
Christ as your Lord and Savior.”
“To save me from what?”
“Eternal damnation.”
“Why would a god damn me eternally? I am a good and kind person.”
“Because being good isn’t enough. You have to say the magic words before it’s too late!”
(they don’t really say it that way, but it’s what they mean.)

Many fundamentalists of various religions are so obsessed with an imagined end of times that they forget to live in the here and now and have an unnecessary pessimistic view of life and this world. There are those god-believing people who do try to help make the world a better place, but at the same time they are doing this they are preaching to people that this world is a bad place and that we all need to be “saved” from something. They say their god is good, but their Bible illustrates that this god is anything but good, and his wrath is only curtailed by killing someone…like his own earthly son. And all over a simple thing like humans using free will that they are given. This mythology is as bizarre as any other from the ancient past.

As this cartoon illustrates, fundies don’t see how absolutely ridiculous they are when they go around preaching that the “end is near” using texts from an ancient books as their “evidence.” Also, I think it is amusing when one religious group thinks they hold the “truth” while scoffing at another who believes something else when it is ALL equally absurd.

January 29th, 2008

Religion: A Convenient Lie (The Reason Why Religion Exists)

Humans are afraid of death and cannot accept the fact that they one day will no longer exist (like all living things, even the stars and everything in the universe has a life span.) This video below says everything that I and other atheists have been saying. Religion is a false security blanket based on fear of death, and created because humans cannot accept what they cannot change or natural events they have no control over. Organized religion bolsters a community belief that might not be there if everyone else didn’t believe it, too. Despite the coming together as one, each individual still creates this image of god in their own minds, according to their own experiences, needs and desires. In other words, god exists only in the minds and imaginations of human beings. There is no evidence at all for the existence of a god any more than there is existence of a child’s imaginary friend.

Whether humans flock together in one big herd of belief, or whether we have individual faith in a supernatural being in a supernatural world, it does not prevent the inevitable. We all eventually die. Hopeless? No. New babies are born, the cycle of life continues. There is enough comfort for me in knowing that somehow the world will go on for as long as the Sun lasts, and it too will one day burn out and die and new stars will be born from its remnants.

I have a potentially life-threatening illness. Am I angry? Sad? Will I run to find some comforting delusional beliefs to cling to delude myself that I will live forever in some imagined afterlife? No. I look to science to help me live for as long as I can, as comfortably and as healthy as I possibly can. But when the day comes when medicine no longer will help, will I whimper and turn to a false hope? No…I will look back upon my life with gladness. I am very glad to have been born, and to have lived to see all the wondrous things I have seen, and and glad for all my human experiences whether good or bad. How you live your life brings meaning, as the quote by Joseph Campbell at the top of the main page of my personal blog states.

Now, here is the video. The music is “divine”.

January 27th, 2008

Fun With Kids

This one comes from Possummomma (with a tip to Pharyngula). This, for those of you who are ignorant, is called a science experiment:

Question: Do unchristians make less moral choices than Christians?

Hypothesis: The Bible is the perfect guide to life that shows us how to be moral people. Without believing in the Bible you can’t know God and he can’t guide you and give you rewards for being a good person. I think people who aren’t Christian will be less successful.

Experiment: I will interview thirty people and ask them if they are Christian. I will give them the same questions so I have a control sample. I think they are immoral if they score lower than 15.

[Some of My Favorite Questions:]
2. Have you ever killed another human being?
9. Do you listen to rap or heavy metal music?
11. Have you ever read Harry Potter or Spiderwick Chronicles or the Golden Compass?
16. Do you take pride in accomplishments other than service to God?

And here’s the funny part:

I will say, though, that the student admitted being surprised by the answers. His hypothesis stated that he believed non-Christians would be sinners more than Christians. But, his “data” showed that no one passed as a moral person.

It was also mentioned that this kid didn’t keep the answers private.

I mean, kids are cute, no question — but xian kids are just a hoot!

Praise Be! Glory!

January 27th, 2008

Tamed Horses - A Peek Inside The Gestalt Behind Religion

ghede

We are often puzzled, befuddled, nonplussed, and otherwise bewildered at the way religious folks cling tenaciously to their beliefs (much like a terrier worrying a dead rat). Obviously this isn’t something as simplistic as intelligence - history abounds with examples of incredibly intelligent people who were religious. There are valid points to be made here - upbringing usually has a deep sway over people. It’s difficult to admit that the people we grew up with and around are trapped in a morass of superstitious anachronisms.

The other piece of the puzzle, I think, lies in the participation of religious rituals.

Let’s talk about possession. This is a predilection of mine (of sorts): hopefully when I’m done, you’ll be nodding and telling yourself, “Hey, that makes sense.”

This link is one I discovered years ago. It’s a fairly well written piece about how high priests, preachers, shamans [insert-head-of-hierarchal-religion-of-your-choice here] and their ilk manage to sway masses of believers at gatherings. (Editor’s note: yes, Sutphen is indeed a New Ager. Yes, he indulges in that romantic nonsense of ‘past lives’, and yes, he’s got a blurb from a publisher that he’s the ‘foremost psychic researcher’. Be that as it may, his insights into this matter make a great deal of logical sense.)

Three distinct and progressive states of transmarginal inhibition were identified by Pavlov. The first is the Equivalent phase, in which the brain gives the same response to both strong and weak stimuli. Second is the Paradoxical phase, in which the brain responds more actively to weak stimuli than to strong. Third is the Ultra-Paradoxical phase, in which conditioned responses and behavior patterns turn from positive to negative or from negative to positive.

With the progressions through each phase, the degree of conversion becomes more effective and complete. The ways to achieve conversion are many and varied, but the usual first step in religious or political brainwashing is to work on the emotions of an individual or group until they reach an abnormal level of anger, fear, excitement or nervous tension.

The progressive result of this mental condition is to impair judgment and increase suggestibility. The more this condition can be maintained or intensified, the more it compounds. Once catharsis or the first brain phase is reached, the complete mental takeover becomes easier. Existing mental programming can be replaced with new patterns of thinking and behavior.

Other often-used physiological weapons to modify normal brain functions are fasting, radical or high sugar diets, physical discomforts, regulation of breathing, mantra chanting in meditation, the disclosure of awesome mysteries, special lighting and sound effects, programmed response to incense, or intoxicating drugs.

The same results can be obtained in contemporary psychiatric treatment by electric shock treatments and even by purposely lowering a patient’s blood sugar level with insulin injections.

It sounds quite a bit like psychological alchemy, does it not? It takes no degree to see how people get swept up by their environment - the attendant synchronization sweeping across the five senses, triggering a plethora of chemical responses, your neighbors grooving to the beat, all those scents, sights, sounds pounding into your brain until you feel that sweet sensation that everyone else is feeling - ever been to a concert? A festival? Any large gatherings of like-minded folks? Ye ken me drift, moving onwards.

For a more skeptical look, here’s a bit from the Church Of Reality.

Further out in left field, I’m going to drag in (as some of you may have guessed by the picture in the right-hand corner) an example from a religion little-discussed in most atheist blogs: Vodou (or, as it’s better known, Voodoo). This is, as some of you know, a syncretic religion composed of Catholicism and a wide variety of pantheistic African religions. More interesting still, it contains multiple instances of spirit possession, by supernatural critters known as Loas. The phrase is that the loa is ‘riding the horse’. Even more intriguing is that, unlike the more Westernized Catholicism, possession is not feared - indeed, it’s accepted with open arms.

There are hints, rumors and whispers that sometimes outsiders (read: non-believers) sometimes ‘fall under the spell’ and become possessed. This isn’t very well documented. Mostly anecdotal - no names, places, dates, etc. I found this bit via Googling - but I fear it may be suspect, as missionaries tend to let too much of their own biases creep into the observations. Sutphen mentions it in the link, but no attribution, name, etc.

As I have mentioned elsewhere, the human mind can be tricked into displacing itself, and also, our species tends to experience hallucinations on a fairly frequent basis. So, it also seems that we can indeed be conned into thinking we’re a completely opposite identity too? A supernatural one at that?

Confusion seems to be a steady element in the human condition.

Color me confused, and turn the page.

Till the next post, then.

January 25th, 2008

Whose double standards?

Farrakhan(Cross posted at The Uncredible Hallq)

Last week, Andrew Sullivan complained about someone demanding “that Obama leave his own church because his preacher has all sorts of crazy views that relate to politics” (particularly Jeremiah Wright’s praise of racist crackpot Louis Farrakhan.) Sullivan treats this as obviously nuts for reasons that aren’t quite clear. The words “double standard” appear in the title, but he never argues that there actually is a double standard here. It actually seems that Sullivan is the one applying a double standard: most people would have no qualms about insisting that a candidate break any former associations with a secular organization that had “all sorts of crazy views that relate to politics.” One standard for religious organizations, another for secular ones.

Now, to be fair to Sullivan, I should note that Sullivan is a gay man, a prominent supporter of gay rights in fact, indeed one of the earliest advocates of gay marriage, who is also a member of the world’s largest anti-gay organization, the Catholic Church. I sort of understand the idea that once you’re Catholic, you don’t get out, it’s like the mob in that respect, so maybe we can’t be too hard on Catholics in these matters. However, Obama is a Protestant, and Protestants aren’t known for hanging around churches whose leaders hold views the parishioners find repugnant. Therefore, it’s perfectly legitimate to wonder about Obama’s religious affiliations.

January 24th, 2008

Fuck ESPN

Mike Downey, Trib Obsessed with Drunken TV Woman’s Rant

Female broadcasters are making the same career-ending blunders as their male counterparts these days, but in many cases, they’re receiving more negative press. Jacobson seems to have dropped the F-bomb a few times (gasp!) while deriding Notre Dame and the Touchdown Jesus, but videos of the roast haven’t been released, and accounts vary as to what she said exactly. [Ed note: Fuck Notre Dame, fuck Touchdown Jesus” and “fuck Jesus,” apparently.]

Also:

Dana Jacobson roasts Jesus

Though ESPN won’t confirm Jacobson’s reported week long suspension, the network did confirm that her remarks were inappropriate. Those remarks were delivered during a Jan. 11 roast for ESPN Radio personalities Mike Greenberg and Mike Golic. Jacobson has often traded punches with Golic, a former Irish defensive lineman. That night, she delivered a wallop. Dropping the F-bomb three times, she reportedly slandered Notre Dame, the icon painted behind their goal posts dubbed “Touchdown Jesus” and finally Jesus himself. Jacobson would certainly not be the first television personality to go after Jesus. Just last year, comedian Kathy Griffin gave a rather unconventional acceptance speech when collecting her Emmy for “My Life on the D-List,” a reality show on the Bravo channel.

It’s difficult for me not to be sympathetic with the comment about females getting more negative press for the same behavior — but hey, I’m biased…

January 24th, 2008

Martin Sheen burns a hypo-christian

Thanks to ChuckA for this one! This YouTube clip from an episode of West Wing was sent to him via an email from a member of Illinois Atheists. Chuck writes “The actual letter to Dr. Laura, featuring the insane stuff from Leviticus (Levisciousness?) that supposedly ‘inspired’ the scene…it’s claimed…is in the subsequent IL Atheist email (below).”

Here is the text of the real letter here:

Dear Dr. Laura,
Thank you so much for doing so much to educate people regarding God’s
Law. I have learned a great deal from your show and I try to share
that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to
defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind him
that Leviticus 18: 22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of
debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of
the specific laws and how to best follow them.

A) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates
a pleasing odor for the Lord (Leviticus 1: 9). The problem is my
neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I
smite them?

B) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in
Exodus 21: 7. In this day & age, what would be a fair market price
for her?

C) I know I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her
period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev 15: 19-24). The problem is how
do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

D) Leviticus 25: 44 states that I may own slaves, both male & female,
provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of
mine claims this applies to Mexicans but not Canadians. Can you
clarify? Why can’t I own Canadians?

E) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus
35: 2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally
obligated to kill him myself?

F) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an
abomination (Lev. 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than
homosexuality. I don’t agree, can you settle this?

G) Leviticus 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if
I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading
glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20 or is there some wiggle room
here?

H) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair
around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by
Leviticus 19:27. How should they die?

I) I know from Leviticus 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig
makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

J) My uncle has a farm. He violates Leviticus 19:19 by planting two
crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of
two different kinds of thread (cotton & polyester blend). He tends to
curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all
the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? (Lev.
24: 10-16). Couldn’t we just burn them to death at a private family
affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws (Lev. 20:
14)?

I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident
you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God’s word is
eternal and unchanging.”

I’m going to keep this one handy in case any fundies I know or happen to run across bring up the Leviticus bullshit as a reason to discriminate against gays.

January 23rd, 2008

Lewis Black - The Devil’s Handiwork

Here is a clip from Lewis’ stand-up comedy act on HBO. I watched the whole show last night and laughed the entire time! He does a great job making fun of religious crap, such as the idea of creationism, creation museums, and how Xians say the devil is trying to trick us with fossils, etc. If you have a chance, try to watch this whole act, if not, YouTube has plenty of clips of highlights from the whole show on subjects of Dubya, Cheney and hunting, and more.

| Next Entries »