<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gotham Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/</link>
	<description>Commentary, news, and rants on the evils and stupidity of belief in the big invisible daddy in the sky.  Illuminating and watchdogging the widespread attempts to institutionalize the theocratic rule of the US. Making fun of believers everywhere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:31:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: benjamin</title>
		<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-329417</link>
		<dc:creator>benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/#comment-329417</guid>
		<description>LMAO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMAO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-329360</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/#comment-329360</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;...not because they’re guys, but because that’s Batman’s &lt;i&gt;ward&lt;/i&gt; for crap’s sake. That’s knocking on incest’s door.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Batman&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Lolita?&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;not because they’re guys, but because that’s Batman’s <i>ward</i> for crap’s sake. That’s knocking on incest’s door.</p></blockquote>
<p>Batman&#8217;s <i>Lolita?</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eve</title>
		<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-329352</link>
		<dc:creator>Eve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/#comment-329352</guid>
		<description>^ True - on the other hand, they are &lt;i&gt;fantasy&lt;/i&gt; characters...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ True &#8211; on the other hand, they are <i>fantasy</i> characters&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-329155</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/#comment-329155</guid>
		<description>Sorry, guys, but Batman kissing Robin &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; wrong; not because they&#039;re guys, but because that&#039;s Batman&#039;s &lt;i&gt;ward&lt;/i&gt; for crap&#039;s sake. That&#039;s knocking on incest&#039;s door. Creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, guys, but Batman kissing Robin <i>is</i> wrong; not because they&#8217;re guys, but because that&#8217;s Batman&#8217;s <i>ward</i> for crap&#8217;s sake. That&#8217;s knocking on incest&#8217;s door. Creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-328762</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 01:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/#comment-328762</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Hey look, guys kissing!&lt;/i&gt;

Oh no!  Shield your children&#039;s eyes!  If they see that, they may become horribly confused and disturbed and never recover! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Hey look, guys kissing!</i></p>
<p>Oh no!  Shield your children&#8217;s eyes!  If they see that, they may become horribly confused and disturbed and never recover! <img src='http://gods4suckers.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eve</title>
		<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-328705</link>
		<dc:creator>Eve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/#comment-328705</guid>
		<description>bernarda, that sounds like a very reasonable and workable approach to the issue - which means we probably won&#039;t be seeing anything like it on a widespread scale here in the US for quite some time.

On the other hand, it&#039;s gratifying as always to see ordinary human beings in the trenches, so to speak, simply going about the business of life and getting what they need for themselves done one way or another - although the &quot;married-no, civil-unioned&quot; business is tiresome to say the least!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bernarda, that sounds like a very reasonable and workable approach to the issue &#8211; which means we probably won&#8217;t be seeing anything like it on a widespread scale here in the US for quite some time.</p>
<p>On the other hand, it&#8217;s gratifying as always to see ordinary human beings in the trenches, so to speak, simply going about the business of life and getting what they need for themselves done one way or another &#8211; although the &#8220;married-no, civil-unioned&#8221; business is tiresome to say the least!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-328658</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/#comment-328658</guid>
		<description>Holy shit, Thomas -- you &lt;i&gt;made&lt;/i&gt; all of those costumes?

That&#039;s incredible!  Well done!

&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s been a fun and sometimes scary game for my husband and I to play in the last few years, when we drive from home in Baltimore to visit folks in New England: New Jersey, we’re Civil-Unioned here, New York, we’re married here, Connecticut, we’re Civil-Unioned here, Massachusetts, we’re married here we think, Vermont, we’re Civil-Unioned here, Canada, we’re married here!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Please accept my apologies for all homophobes everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy shit, Thomas &#8212; you <i>made</i> all of those costumes?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s incredible!  Well done!</p>
<blockquote><p>It’s been a fun and sometimes scary game for my husband and I to play in the last few years, when we drive from home in Baltimore to visit folks in New England: New Jersey, we’re Civil-Unioned here, New York, we’re married here, Connecticut, we’re Civil-Unioned here, Massachusetts, we’re married here we think, Vermont, we’re Civil-Unioned here, Canada, we’re married here!</p></blockquote>
<p>Please accept my apologies for all homophobes everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernarda</title>
		<link>http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-328602</link>
		<dc:creator>bernarda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 08:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/02/06/gotham-rules/#comment-328602</guid>
		<description>- First, I have to admit that a few years ago I thought that this gay marriage thing was just a side issue and worried that it was just stick to be used by hypocritical Rethuglicans to win elections, especially close ones.

But I have been surprised about how far things have progressed and that it has become far more mainstream and now admit my error. However, I still don&#039;t see the need for the &quot;M&quot; word. 

In some countries, like France, all marriages have to be done by a government representative, usually the mayor. Purely religious marriages are not recognized. France has a civil union law called the PAC which insures the rights of partners who are not in the traditional scope of marriage. So they benefit the same as married couples. It even gives protection to foreigners who might be having immigration problems.

One of the interesting things is that the French law is not only for same sex couples. Members of a family who run a business, for example, can create a PAC&#039;s for tax and inheritance reasons. So if one dies, the other doesn&#039;t lose the business or even a shared home.

I think marriage itself should simply be replaced by something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- First, I have to admit that a few years ago I thought that this gay marriage thing was just a side issue and worried that it was just stick to be used by hypocritical Rethuglicans to win elections, especially close ones.</p>
<p>But I have been surprised about how far things have progressed and that it has become far more mainstream and now admit my error. However, I still don&#8217;t see the need for the &#8220;M&#8221; word. </p>
<p>In some countries, like France, all marriages have to be done by a government representative, usually the mayor. Purely religious marriages are not recognized. France has a civil union law called the PAC which insures the rights of partners who are not in the traditional scope of marriage. So they benefit the same as married couples. It even gives protection to foreigners who might be having immigration problems.</p>
<p>One of the interesting things is that the French law is not only for same sex couples. Members of a family who run a business, for example, can create a PAC&#8217;s for tax and inheritance reasons. So if one dies, the other doesn&#8217;t lose the business or even a shared home.</p>
<p>I think marriage itself should simply be replaced by something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
