Just one sentence too many. To borrow from Abbie Hoffman, we don’t need leaders. We need cheerleaders. While I don’t claim to speak FOR science myself, I do occasionally speak UP for science.
]]>Witnesses report that the expression on the movie producer’s face when he announced the Q&A after the film and none other than Dawkins stood up to ask him a question was indescribable; he most definitely hadn’t known that he’d expelled the fox while letting in the wolf!
]]>Travdawg, I was just over there reading some of the comments.
]]>The problem here is Nisbet- and his ilk, first disputing that a greater understanding of science does tend to decrease one’s reliance on fairy tale ideologies and, then, chastising those of us who, having cleared our minds of such Bronze Age claptrap, refuse to bow to the traditional king- who’s been revealed to be no more than a fat, greasy, toad of a man, cowering behind a curtain and pulling the switches.
It’s like people who are so obsessed with the positioning of certain pieces of silverware in a table setting, they miss the fact that the meat on the table has long since passed it’s sell by date. I think they call them “nitpickers”- which is not to say that PZ, or Richard Dawkins, or any of us is teeming with lice…
]]>