Shattering The Tablets Of Myth

3 August 2008 by KA

bizarro-moses-ten-commandements

I have mentioned the roots of the Ten Commandments elsewhere - but I stumbled across this excellent article by Richard Carrier recently, and he gives persuasive argument for the root of the laws by which our society actually bides by:

I keep hearing this chant, variously phrased: “The Ten Commandments are the foundation of Western morality and the American Constitution and government.” In saying this, people are essentially crediting Moses with the invention of ethics, democracy and civil rights, a claim that is of course absurd. But its absurdity is eclipsed by its injustice, for there is another lawmaker who is far more important to us, whose ideas and actions lie far more at the foundation of American government, and whose own Ten Commandments were distributed at large and influencing the greatest civilizations of the West–Greece and Rome–for well over half a millennia before the laws of Moses were anything near a universal social influence. In fact, by the time the Ten Commandments of Moses had any real chance of being the foundation of anything in Western society, democracy and civil rights had all but died out, never to rise again until the ideals of our true hero, the real man to whom we owe all reverence, were rediscovered and implemented in what we now call “modern democratic principles.”

The man I am talking about is Solon the Athenian. Solon was born, we believe, around 638 B.C.E., and lived until approximately 558, but the date in his life of greatest importance to us is the year he was elected to create a constitution for Athens, 594 B.C.E. How important is this man? Let’s examine what we owe to him, in comparison with the legendary author (or at last, in legend, the transmitter) of the Judeo-Christian Ten Commandments. Solon is the founder of Western democracy and the first man in history to articulate ideas of equal rights for all citizens, and though he did not go nearly as far in the latter as we have come today, Moses can claim no connection to either. Solon was the first man in Western history to publicly record a civil constitution in writing. No one in Hebrew history did anything of the kind, least of all Moses. Solon advocated not only the right but even the duty of every citizen to bear arms in the defense of the state–to him we owe the 2nd Amendment. Nothing about that is to be found in the Ten Commandments of Moses. Solon set up laws defending the principles and importance of private property, state encouragement of economic trades and crafts, and a strong middle class–the ideals which lie at the heart of American prosperity, yet which cannot be credited at all to Moses.

Solon is one of two statues in the Jefferson Reading room - and while we’re (slightly) on the topic here, Jefferson’s commentary on Fortescue:

In truth, the alliance between Church and State in England has ever made their judges accomplices in the frauds of the clergy; and even bolder than they are. For instead of being contented with these four surreptitious chapters of Exodus, they have taken the whole leap, and declared at once that the whole Bible and Testament in a lump, make a part of the common law; ante 873: the first judicial declaration of which was by this same Sir Matthew Hale. And thus they incorporate into the English code laws made for the Jews alone, and the precepts of the gospel, intended by their benevolent author as obligatory only in foro concientiæ; and they arm the whole with the coercions of municipal law. In doing this, too, they have not even used the Connecticut caution of declaring, as is done in their blue laws, that the laws of God shall be the laws of their land, except where their own contradict them; but they swallow the yea and nay together. Finally, in answer to Fortescue Aland’s question why the ten commandments should not now be a part of the common law of England? we may say they are not because they never were made so by legislative authority, the document which has imposed that doubt on him being a manifest forgery.

And this matters, why? Because English law is the basis and backbone of our judiciary system, that’s why.

And so a trite refrain rebutted, another fairy tale bites the dust, and reality again - it is far more potent than the gossamer wings of fables, and by far more intriguing.

Till the next post, then.

Share/Save/Bookmark

8 comments to “Shattering The Tablets Of Myth”

  1. AtheistUnderMask:

    Has anyone else seen this contradiction in the Bible: There’s another set of Commandments that are deemed to be written with the same words as the first, but are entirely different.

    It starts in Exodus 34. I think the last verse of this story says that these are the 10 commandments.

  2. Stardust:

    Another great “Sunday Sermon” KA. Yes, another fairy tale bites the dust.
    This is a great point of why the ten commandments should not be part of common law: “we may say they are not because they never were made so by legislative authority” (And if they try to make it part of common law via “legislative authority, they are in for a huge resistance.)

    AUM, Yes, I have read that contradiction in the Bible a few times, and yes those other set of commandments are very different from the first. Just another bunch of Biblical inconsistency and contradiction amongst many.

  3. Krystalline Apostate:

    Just another bunch of Biblical inconsistency and contradiction amongst many.

    Oh, lawsy lawsy, no! The wholly bibble ain’t contradictin’ itself - you just ain’t raydin’ it prah-peh-ly. Why, much of it should be ray-ed meta-phorah-’kly
    I have always ruh-lied on the kaind-nayss of stray-ngerss, dontcha know?
    ;)

  4. Stardust:

    Here’s a good one they SHOULD display

  5. Eve:

    I’ve also heard that the Jewish version of the Old Testament has slightly different version(s?) of the Ten Commandments as well - just another reason to nip this “it’s the basis of our laws!” crap as quickly as we can whenever it pops up.

  6. The Atheist Jew:

    What about Hammurabi’s Laws. They were written around 1750 BC. I have a theory that the Moses myth is based on Hammurabi and Persian history.

  7. cognitive dissident:

    Speaking of the illustrious Jefferson, he made some other comments on Christianity not being the foundation of English (and therefore American) common law:

    “For we know that the common law is that system of law which was introduced by the Saxons on their settlement of England, and altered from time to time by proper legislative authority from that time to the date of the Magna Charta, which terminates the period of the common law…This settlement took place about the middle of the fifth century. But Christianity was not introduced till the seventh century; the conversion of the first Christian king of the Heptarchy having taken place about the year 598, and that of the last about 686. Here then, was a space of two hundred years, during which the common law was in existence, and Christianity no part of it…that system of religion could not be a part of the common law, because they were not yet Christians…we may safely affirm…that Christianity neither is, nor ever was a part of the common law.” (letter to Thomas Cooper, 10 February 1814)

  8. fritzy:

    Like so many claims by xtains these days, this one has no basis in fact, and no evidence, either historical or contemporary, to support it.

    Like religion itself, it is a claim based on wishful thinking (and I would argue, if their wishes were to come true, many of those who make this claim would quickly do an about-face and wish the 10 commandments were NOT the basis of our government.) Fortunately, at least in this case, wishful thinking is about as substantial as fairy dust.

    It bothers me that rationalists even have to make this arguement anymore–the claim is a non-starter from the get-go.

    Thanks KA, for a very interesting post.